Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gaines v. COMANCHE COUNTY MEDICAL HOSPITAL & NURSEFINDERS, INC.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 2006No. 100598Published

1Concurrence

OPALA, J.,

with whom WATT, C.J., and COLBERT, J., join, concurring.

¶ 1 The court reverses today a summary judgment for the defendants, declares a *212nurse’s affidavit does provide an evidentiary substitute with an acceptable expert opinion on the etiology of decubitus ulcers, and remands the cause for trial of disputed fact issues.

¶2 Although I concur in the court’s pronouncement, I write separately to articulate some of the reasons that impel me to the court’s view.

I

THE ROOTS OF A REGISTERED NURSE’S EXPERTISE IN THE ETIOLOGY OF DECUBITUS ULCERS

A

Training, Education and Experience

¶ 3 A registered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API