Legal Opinion

Amer. Photocopy Eq. Co. v. Ampto, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 20, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

82 N.J. Super. 531 (1964)

198 A.2d 469

AMERICAN PHOTOCOPY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION (SUBSTITUTED AS PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT FOR COPEASE MANUFACTURING CO., INC.), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

AMPTO, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND AMPTO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 12, 1963.

Decided February 20, 1964.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.

Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, and Mr. William C. Conner of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).

Mr.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Composecure, L. L.C. v. Cardux, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Petition of Den Norske Amerikalinje A/SDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
  3. American Photocopy Equipment Company v. Rovico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  4. Ponzoni v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  5. Adkins v. Lear, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API