Legal Opinion
Soviet Pan Am Travel Effort v. Travel Committee, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 16, 1991No. 89 Civ. 2141 (RWS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Travel Committee, Inc. (“TCI”), World Travel, Inc. (“WTI”), Travel Destinations, Inc. (“TDI”), Stanley L. Levin (“Levin”) and Ira S. Weiner (“Weiner”) have moved to dismiss the amended complaint (“the Complaint”) of plaintiff Soviet Pan Am Travel Effort (“SPATE”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, failure to plead fraud with particularity and for vagueness. In the alternative, they seek an order transferring this action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland pursuant to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,517 Kalb, Voorhis & Co. v. American Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Sofi Classic S.A. de C.V. v. HurowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Kinetic Instruments, Inc. v. LaresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.