Legal Opinion
Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1995No. 95 Civ. 2467 (RWS)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The ACB Defendants 1 have moved to dismiss the complaint of Plaintifi/Debtor Houbi-gant, Inc. (“Houbigant”). Houbigant and Plaintiff PPI have each moved to dismiss all of the counterclaims asserted against them by ACB. Counterclaim-Defendant Chemical Bank (“Chemical”) has moved to dismiss the claim asserted against it by ACB. For the reasons discussed herein, the motions are denied in part and granted in part.
Parties
Houbigant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in New York, New York. Houbigant is…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- ICD Holdings S.A. v. FrankelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.