United States v. Arthur E. O'Neill
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by the Government from the dismissal of an indictment charging a violation of the gun control provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 raises a straightforward legal question: Must the Government allege and prove a nexus with interstate commerce in order to charge a violation of §§ 922(a) (6) and 924(a) 1 of that Act? The district court concluded that it did. We disagree and reverse.
The one-count indictment, which alleges that on October 1,1970, the defendant O’Neill, in acquiring a firearm from a licensed dealer, falsely…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. William NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sam Frank Mandina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Robert James AndrinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. FridayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.