Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur E. O'Neill

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 21, 1972No. 885, Docket 72-1380PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by the Government from the dismissal of an indictment charging a violation of the gun control provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 raises a straightforward legal question: Must the Government allege and prove a nexus with interstate commerce in order to charge a violation of §§ 922(a) (6) and 924(a) 1 of that Act? The district court concluded that it did. We disagree and reverse.

The one-count indictment, which alleges that on October 1,1970, the defendant O’Neill, in acquiring a firearm from a licensed dealer, falsely…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. William NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sam Frank Mandina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Robert James AndrinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. FridayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API