Legal Opinion

Sam Frank Mandina v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1973No. 72-1474PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(a) (1) requires as an essential element of the offense of unlawful dealing in firearms or ammunition an allegation and proof such activities were in interstate or foreign commerce. Appellant (Mandina) as-' serts in the alternative that if the statute applies to wholly intrastate activities then Congress has exceeded its constitutional authority and the statute is unconstitutional.

Mandina was charged by indictment with engaging “in the business of dealing in firearms and ammunition without being licensed to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Ernest DayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Willie D. King, Fred Lee Jones and Tellis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Adam FriedrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Spears v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. PanettaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API