Legal Opinion

Trotti v. Piacente

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 19, 1965No. Ex. Nos. 10612-10614PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

These three actions of trespass on the case for negligence arise out of a collision .between two motor vehicles. The vehicle in which Michele Trotti, a minor, was a passenger was owned by Madeline P'iacente and was operated by her son Carlo. One suit is by the passenger against the owner, and the other two are separate actions for consequential damages 'by the passenger’s father against the -operator and the owner respectively. The defendant in each case filed a plea of puis darrien -continuance setting forth that subsequent to the commencement of the suit Michele Trotti married Carlo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Chase v. New Haven Waste Material CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Castellucci v. CastellucciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Digby v. DigbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Zarrella v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  3. Morales v. Town of JohnstonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. Asplin v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. LeBlanc v. StuartDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API