Legal Opinion
Bae Systems Technology Solution & Services, Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 19, 2016No. Case No.: PWG-14-3551PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge
Plaintiff BAE Systems Technology Solution & Services, Inc. (“BAE”) and Defendant the Republic of Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program . Administration (“DAPA”) entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”), in conjunction with a Letter of Agreement between the United States and the Republic of Korea to upgrade the Republic of Korea’s F-16 fighter fleet. When the contract between the nations terminated, DAPA felt that BAE had breached the MOA, while BAE felt that it had no ongoing obligation to DAPA. BAE filed suit here, seeking a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc. v. YahyaviDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024