Legal Opinion

Nantz v. Lexington Lincoln Mercury Subaru

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1997No. 95-SC-455-DG, 95-SC-449-DGPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the Leslie Circuit Court’s granting of a summary judgment in favor of the appellees herein. The central issue in the present case focuses on when title to a motor vehicle passes from a commercial car dealer to a buyer under Kentucky’s titling and registration statutes, KRS 186A.010, et seq., for the purpose of determining liability insurance coverage.

This case originated when Lexington Lincoln Mercury Subaru [hereinafter “Lexington”], a commercial dealer, sold an automobile to Delbert…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potts v. DraperKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cowles v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  3. Rogers v. WheelerKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. MaddixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Revenue Cabinet v. O'DANIELKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sisters of Charity Health Systems, Inc. v. RaikesKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Travelers Indem. Co. v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Auto Acceptance Corp. v. T.I.G. Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Gainsco Companies v. GentryKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API