Legal Opinion

Gainsco Companies v. Gentry

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2006No. 2004-SC-0276-DGPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Justice JOHNSTONE.

Appellants (Gainsco Companies, H & H Auto & Trailer Sales, Inc., and David Holder) appeal from an order of the Barren Circuit Court granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees (Darrell Gentry, as guardian for his son Joshua Gentry, Joe Allen Booth, as guardian for his son Jonathan Booth, and Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance Company). The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment and this Court granted discretionary review. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm.

On April 6, 2000, H & H Auto & Trailer Sales, Inc. (H & H) purchased a 1996 Dodge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Blevins v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
  3. City of Florence, Kentucky v. ChipmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nantz v. Lexington Lincoln Mercury SubaruKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Auto Acceptance Corp. v. T.I.G. Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Travelers Indem. Co. v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Calhoun v. ProvenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. CoffeyKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. CoffeyKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Delores Zepeda v. Central Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API