Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge McCULLOUGH.
I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s thoughtful opinion because I do not believe that the state common law negligence action filed on behalf of David Miller and 126 Hotel Corporation (collectively, Miller) against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) was preempted by federal law, namely, the Federal Railroad Safety Act (Railroad Safety Act).1 Hence, I would reverse the grant of summary judgment to SEPTA by the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County (trial court).
The Majority correctly notes that our Supreme Court has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Mastrocola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. ManfrediDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009