Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mastrocola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 2008No. 1774 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Thomas Mastrocola, Chris and Michelle Hammel, Michelle McDonald, Wardlaw and Joyce Hall, John and Peggy Weston, and Elizabeth Graves (collectively, Homeowners) and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeal two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) denying their respective motions for post-trial relief. Homeowners filed a civil complaint alleging that SEPTA negligently constructed temporary railroad track that resulted in vibration that damaged their properties. 1 A jury trial was held and a verdict was rendered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ShanklinSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Blackwell v. Com., State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boniella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform v. Centre County District Attorney's OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Alma v. Monroe County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Van Buren v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API