Legal Opinion

Tube-Art Display, Inc. v. Berg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1950No. 31284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was brought to recover the balance alleged to be due for rental of an electric sign pursuant to a written agreement.

The trial court rendered an oral decision, in which it construed the agreement in accordance with the defendants’ contentions, and, after making its findings of fact, entered judgment dismissing the action. Upon denial of plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the decision of the court or for a new trial, it appealed to this court from the judgment of dismissal.'

Appellant is a Washington corporation engaged in the business of constructing, leasing, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vance v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Johnston v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Krutz v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McBride v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brust v. McDONALD'S CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. Tepley v. SumerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bellevue Square Managers v. GranbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Crofton v. BargreenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Crofton v. BargreenWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API