Legal Opinion
Taft v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1934No. Civ. No. 1338; Civ. No. 1342PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
Judgment in this action was entered on March 29, 1933. A motion for a new trial was denied on May 31, 1933. On June 10, 1933, the plaintiff filed notice of appeal and also filed a notice addressed to the clerk of the court requesting the preparation of a transcript. The clerk fixed the amount of the undertaking to be filed in connection with said request for a transcript and notified counsel' for the appellant. No undertaking has been filed and no transcript has been settled or filed. The record does not disclose that anything further has ever been done in connection with preparing or filing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. BowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- In re Estate of GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Swan v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Neighbours v. NeighboursCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Koshaba v. KoshabaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943