Legal Opinion
Koshaba v. Koshaba
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1942No. Civ. No. 11881PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODELL, J. pro tem.
The respondent has moved for a dismissal of this appeal. The appeal to which the motion is addressed is from an order refusing to set aside an earlier order which terminated proceedings for a transcript on appeal in the main case. In the main case judgment was entered in favor of respondent and against appellants on October 17, 1938. A motion for new trial was denied and on December 28, 1938, a notice of appeal from the judgment was filed and a request made for a transcript. There was delay in its preparation, and on April 24, 1939, respondent served upon appellants a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Howland v. HowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Taft v. Security-First National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Koshaba v. KoshabaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. SpalisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943