Legal Opinion
Chapman Law Firm Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 6, 2006No. 06-330CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
In this bid protest action, filed on April 27, 2006, the Court has before it Defendant’s May 19, 2006 motion to dismiss, requesting that the procuring agency be permitted to implement corrective action. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that the agency’s proposed plan for reopening discussions and obtaining an updated proposal from only one offeror is without a rational basis and is contrary to law. This proposed plan violates basic principles of competition in Federal procurement, and is not in the best interests of the Government. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Caci Field Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chapman Law Firm Co. v. Greenleaf Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- RhinoCorps Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Technical Innovation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.