Legal Opinion

Clinton Police Department Bargaining Unit v. Iowa Public Employment Relations Board

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1986No. 85-1850PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

Here the question is whether a union’s collective bargaining proposal constituted a mandatory or a permissive subject of bargaining within the meaning of sections 20.7 and 20.9 of the Iowa Public Employment Relations Act, Iowa Code chapter 20 (1985). The Public Employment Relations Board (PER Board) decided the proposal was a permissive, not a mandatory, subject of bargaining and the district court on judicial review agreed. We affirm.

In the fall of 1984 the petitioner Clinton Police Department Bargaining Unit (union) and the intervenor City of Clinton (city) commenced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Fort Dodge v. Iowa Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Charles City Community School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Public Employment Relations Board v. StohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Charles City Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Waterloo Education Ass'n v. Iowa Public Employment RelationsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  3. State v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Decatur County v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Sioux City Community School District v. Iowa State Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API