HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. v. Bymoen
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*201OPINION
By the Court,
Parraguirre, J.:
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada has certified, under NRAP 5, three questions concerning “[w]hether the Nevada rule stated in Traffic Control Servs. v. United Rentals, 120 Nev. 168, 172, 87 P.3d 1054, 1057 (2004), that ‘absent an agreement negotiated at arm’s length, which explicitly permits assignment and which is supported by separate consideration, employee [non-competition] covenants are not assignable,’ applies when a successor corporation acquires a non-competition covenant!, or a covenant of nonsolicitation or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin, ACA v. WysockiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Corporate Exp. Office Products, Inc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Sisco v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle MinaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIANNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Ruiz v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
- United Statesi Ins. Servs. Nat'l, Inc. v. OgdenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY MGMT. VS. GILMORENevada Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.