Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reedhead v. City of Olympia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922No. 17426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

—An ordinance of the city of Olympia provides for the licensing of bowling alleys, pool and billard halls, and places of business where card playing and pool and billiard playing are carried *240on, and where soft drinks and liquid refreshments are sold, a portion of the second section of that ordinance reading:

“Application shall be in writing and submitted to the city council; no license shall be issued to any person not of good moral character; and any holder of a license who shall be convicted of any violation of the city or state prohibitory ordinances or laws shall have his license forthwith…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Makris v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. City of Seattle v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wallace v. Mayor of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Vincent v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State ex rel. City of Aberdeen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Billado v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  2. Bungalow Amusement Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Tarver v. City Commission of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Seattle v. BittnerWashington Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API