Legal Opinion

Bowling v. MARGARET R. PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 2006No. COA 05-1497PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

No state court shall have jurisdiction over an action filed under the North Carolina Persons with Disabilities Protection Act (North Carolina Disabilities Act), where the plaintiff has commenced federal administrative proceedings under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).1 Plaintiff argues that because he only commenced discrimination proceedings under the ADA with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), this provision does not bar his North Carolina Disabilities Act action. Since filing a claim with the EEOC commences "federal administrative proceedings," we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Hospice of Henderson County, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Holland v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Brinson v. Brosnan Risk ConsultantsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
  4. Carlie Bowling v. Margaret R. Pardee Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Dillard v. Starpower, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API