Legal Opinion
Division 587, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Defendant-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1981No. 80-3532PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (“Metro”) appeals from a preliminary injunction ordering it to submit to interest arbitration of a new collective bargaining agreement pursuant to the terms of a contract required by § 13(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, 49 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq.. Four other circuits have considered union applications to enforce parallel provisions of similar contracts; in all instances the union’s position was sustained. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO v. Jackson Transit Auth., 650 F.2d 1379 (6th Cir.)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McFaddin Express, Inc. v. Adley Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- City of Spokane v. Spokane Police GuildWashington Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Local Division 732, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. Division 587, Amalgamated Transit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Drummond v. HoukDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.