Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Baptist General Convention

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1987No. 54711. (54712, 54856 and 54857 consolidated.)Published

1Concurrence 1

KAUGER, Justice,

concurring, with whom DOOLIN, Chief Justice, HODGES and ALMA WILSON, Justices, join:

Although I concur with the majority opinion, it has failed to answer one of the questions squarely presented by the appellant, The Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma, d/b/a/, Miami Baptist Hospital. As the hospital puts it, the question now before this Court is whether 12 O.S.Supp. 1979 § 727 has retroactive, or prospective effect. The hospital argues that § 727 must be applied prospectively — the hospital is right. Apparently, because of the pending counter claim, the majority has left…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Opala.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. O'Brien v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API