Legal Opinion

Hommel Mfg. Co. v. East Side Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 18, 1926No. 1501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge,

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff Sullivan, as patentee, and by his licensee, Hommel Manufacturing Company, to restrain the manufacture and sale of Sullivan’s-device by the defendants, on the ground that such manufacture and sale constitute an infringement upon United States reissue letters patent No. 16,-103; said patent being a reissue of original patent No. 1,435,429, granted to Sullivan November 14, 1922, for the same alleged invention. The infringement complained of results from the fact that the defendant Walter E. Marquart is manufacturing and selling the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Naceskid Service Chain Co. v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Emil Schlittler and Andreia UfferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API