Brown v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Indictment for rape. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. August 1, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.
1. Upon the trial of one under an indictment for rape, the court did not err (the evidence authorizing it) in instructing the jury: “If you believe and find from the evidence submitted in this case that the defendant now on trial had carnal knowledge of Penny Jones [the prosecutrix, and the wife of another], and that at the time she was asleep and not consenting, or having given the defendant any reason to believe she consented, and the sexual connection was against her will, the jury would be authorized to find that the act was one of rape. Carnal knowledge of a woman while she is asleep and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- State v. ShroyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hurt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- State v. MoormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Commonwealth v. StephensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.