Legal Opinion

Globe Knitting Works v. Segal

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1917No. 1295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the Globe Knitting Works against Keeva Segal and Benjamin Segal. Sur trial hearing on bill, answer, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

[1-3] The remedies allowed to the owner of a patented device for a trespass upon his property rights involve the right of recovery for the damages sustained where a legal injury exists. The remedy to enforce this right is primarily afforded through an action at law. There is also included the right to a writ of injunction restraining the defendant from further infringement. This remedy is necessarily an equitable one. Because of this necessity, where an injunction is sought, to resort to a court of equity, that court, in order' to do complete and full justice, may…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Globe Knitting Works v. SegalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  2. Churchward International Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Recamier, Mfg. Co. v. Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API