Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Crum

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

On January 22, 1924, this court had before it on demurrer the case of Janzen v. Crum, 50 N. D. 544, 197 N. W. 138.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant, C. L. Crum, as an assistant attorney general, appointed to prosecute O. N. Janzen upon a charge of embezzlement, demanded of, and received from C. N. Janzen and Bertha Janzen the sum of $Y00 on a promise of immunity. The defendant demurred to the complaint, claiming that the agreement-pleaded was void as against public policy and criminal.

This court rendered its opinion, holding such an agreement to be void. The matter, however, being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Janzen v. CrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SmagulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API