Henderson v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
This appeal has two core issues.
One involves a discovery sanction.
The other, evidence of prior accidents.
We reverse and remand.
As this case involves no question of the sufficiency of the evidence establishing defendant’s liability, an extended recitation of the facts is not necessary. Suffice it to say that on January 13, 1977, there was a collision between an automobile occupied by the plaintiffs (a mother and her two-year-old daughter) and one of the defendant’s trains at a crossing in Hartsburg, Illinois. Both the mother and the daughter were injured.
They brought suit against the railroad…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Churchill v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Ray v. Cock Robin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Bloomington v. LeggIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Moore v. Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Poelker v. Warrensburg-Latham Community Unit School District No. 11Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Snyder v. Curran TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Bank of Illinois v. ThweattAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Bradfield v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Gaines v. TownsendAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.