Legal Opinion
Ben Saidi v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2015No. 14-CM-136PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITZ, Associate Judge:
A judge of the Superior Court found appellant Ben Saidi guilty of assault following a non-jury trial. Mr. Saidi appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support his conviction and that the trial judge failed to make adequate “special findings” in accordance with his timely request under Rule 23(c) of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reject the legal sufficiency argument but agree that the trial judge did not make the requisite findings on all disputed issues of fact and law essential to the resolution of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- United States v. OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Kenny Hogue and Jesse MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Whitt SnowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- EDWARD BROWN v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- MICHAEL J. WARNER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Eric Toomer v. William C. Smith & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- ANTHONY BELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.