Sanders v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
■ I cannot escape the conviction that the verdict in this case should not have been received and recorded.
It appears that according with a prevailing custom, as the Court was about to adjourn for the day, the case having been or was about to' be submitted to the jury, it was agreed, and so ordered by the presiding Judge, that the jury upon agreement might disperse and bring into Court the next morning a sealed verdict. In a short while the jury announced to the bailiff in charge that they had agreed upon a verdict, and were allowed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
- State v. BramlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.