Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1930No. 12817PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

■ I cannot escape the conviction that the verdict in this case should not have been received and recorded.

It appears that according with a prevailing custom, as the Court was about to adjourn for the day, the case having been or was about to' be submitted to the jury, it was agreed, and so ordered by the presiding Judge, that the jury upon agreement might disperse and bring into Court the next morning a sealed verdict. In a short while the jury announced to the bailiff in charge that they had agreed upon a verdict, and were allowed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Freeman v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. BramlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API