Legal Opinion

Stith v. Civil Service Com'n of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1968No. 52944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

The immediate problem before us is one of procedure and the limitations on relief by mandamus. In the background and the original cause of dispute are two separate chapters in our Code. Section 97B.45 the retirement provision under the Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System, commonly called I.P.E.R.S., provides for mandatory retirement at age 70 except under conditions not appearing here. Chapter 365 relates to Civil Service employees in cities and towns.

The facts condensed from the several pleadings and motions do not disclose any material factual dispute.

Plaintiff was an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Dempsey v. AlberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Hougen v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. State v. GaffneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Charles Gabus Ford, Inc. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Reed v. GaylordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Stafford v. Valley Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Hewitt v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Bellon v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API