Legal Opinion

Hougen v. George

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1963No. 50973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

— This is a mandamus action involving the powers and responsibilities of the Tax Commission of the State of Iowa, acting as a Board of Review. The trial court sustained a motion by defendants to dismiss the petition. Plaintiff appealed.

Plaintiff’s petition consists of three divisions. His contentions are: 1. That a writ of mandamus should issue ordering defendants to reinstate and enforce adjustments of property values as provided in notices of October 17, 1961, sent to the auditors of 47 counties in the state. 2. That writ of mandamus should issue against defendants ordering a reduction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Miller v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. City of Charles City v. RamsaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Valentine v. Independent School District of CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bd. of Sup'rs of Linn Cty. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Appanoose County Rural Taxpayers Assoc., Inc. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Avery v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Headid v. RodmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Stith v. Civil Service Com'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API