Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1984No. 83-739PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

We granted review of a court of appeals decision conditionally sustaining a petition for writ of mandamus. Plaintiff Donald J. Hewitt requested the writ in an original action in this court, alleging that defendant Judge Rodney J. Ryan should be prohibited from conducting proceedings in the district court for valuing an interest in stock awarded to Donald’s former wife in a dissolution action. We transferred the mandamus action to the court of appeals. In previously deciding an appeal in the dissolution case, the court of appeals had found that a valuation of the stock was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reed v. GaylordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Dunton v. McCookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Baird v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Virginia Manor, Inc. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heck v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Schaller v. State Ex Rel. Iowa Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Bellon v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
  4. Moderate Income Housing, Inc. v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Patterson v. StarnOhio Supreme Court · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API