Dahlman v. Forster
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for MiVwcmlcee County. The case is stated in the opinion. The defendant Forster appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtObtoh, J.
This action was brought upon a promissory note signed by J. S. Mabbett & Co., and it was alleged in the complaint that such firm consisted of the defendants, George Forster and Joseph S. Mabbett. The defendant Forster, in his answer, denied the partnership. To prove the partnership, the records and judgment roll in several mechanics’ liens and other suits, in which the said Forster and Mabbett yrere parties, but in which neither the payees nor holders of the note in suit were parties or privies, were introduced in evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, by which records it appeared that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Conklin v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- Orman v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bursinger v. Bank of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Murphy v. HindmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- De Bock v. De BockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cragin & Co. v. International S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Continental Oil Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936