Legal Opinion

Cragin & Co. v. International S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1926No. 16PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Admittedly nothing is due the plaintiff individually; it sues as trustee for brokers under Kokusai v. Argos (C. C. A.) 280 F. 700. The existence of the trustee*264ship depends on the truth or falsity of the assertion that plaintiff chartered defendant’s vessel. The truth is that plaintiff did not so charter, but it is asserted here — and this is the gist of the whole case — that, because Suzuki & Co. (being defendant’s agents) sued plaintiff as charterer and recovered judgment for the charter hire, defendant is now estopped of record from denying that defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. The ThamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Collins v. . HydornNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  2. McVeigh v. McGurrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Martran Steamship Co. v. Aegean Tankers LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. The SpeybankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  5. In Re O'DellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API