Cragin & Co. v. International S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Admittedly nothing is due the plaintiff individually; it sues as trustee for brokers under Kokusai v. Argos (C. C. A.) 280 F. 700. The existence of the trustee*264ship depends on the truth or falsity of the assertion that plaintiff chartered defendant’s vessel. The truth is that plaintiff did not so charter, but it is asserted here — and this is the gist of the whole case — that, because Suzuki & Co. (being defendant’s agents) sued plaintiff as charterer and recovered judgment for the charter hire, defendant is now estopped of record from denying that defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- The ThamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Collins v. . HydornNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCulloch v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- McVeigh v. McGurrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Martran Steamship Co. v. Aegean Tankers LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- The SpeybankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- In Re O'DellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.