Legal Opinion

McLain v. Gilliam

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1965No. 3975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Ruth A. McLain and Dean Gilliam were engaged to be married. During said engagement, in contemplation of marriage, McLain delivered to Gilliam $4200.00 of her money which Gilliam paid on his debts. Thereafter Gilliam broke the engagement and McLain sued to recover her money. The jury found that said money did not belong to McLain; that McLain delivered the $4200.00 to Gilliam as a gift and that Mc-Lain intended to make a gift to Gilliam of the $4200.00 “after their engagement had terminated.” Judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing. She has appealed.

Appellant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guffin v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Williamson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  3. Priebe v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Grossman v. GreensteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Burke v. NutterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Fredric N. Eshelman v. True the Vote, Inc., Catherine Engelbrecht, William Engelbrecht OPSEC Group LLC Gregg Phillips The Bopp Law Firm, P.C. James Bopp, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022
  3. Patsy Dyess v. William Fagerberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API