Legal Opinion
J. Radley Metzger Co. v. Fay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 17, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction restraining them from picketing plaintiff’s premises, and denying defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency.
Plaintiff operates a plastic manufacturing company employing approximately 65 to 70 employees. In April, 1953, plaintiff entered into a collective agreement with Local 229 of the United Textile Workers of America (hereinafter called “ Local 229 ”) as a representative of all of its employees. That agreement was extended on December 12, 1956 for a period ending October 1, 1958.
It appears that in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Wood v. O'GradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Swarts v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Waldbaum, Inc. v. United Farm WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Burger King Corp. v. 111 Cedar Street Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Romero v. Journeymen Barbers, Hair Dressers, Cosmetologists & Proprietors International Union of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Romero v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958