Legal Opinion
Prince v. Division of Family Services
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1994No. WD 48694PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.
Judith Prince appeals the Division of Family Services’ (DFS) ruling that an overpayment, caused by DFS’s own error, of sums Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) could be recouped from her on the grounds: 1) the decision was against the weight of the evidence, erroneously applied the law and was not supported by sufficient evidence; and 2) the state was estopped from recouping the overpaid sums. This court affirms the agency’s decision as affirmed by the trial court.
Prince applied for AFDC benefits in October, 1990. She had two children. DFS determined she…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Collins v. Division of WelfareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Missouri Gas Energy v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Halford v. Missouri State Highway PatrolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hermann v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- SGOH Acquisition Inc. v. Missouri Department of Mental HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Deford-Goff v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.