Legal Opinion
Committee of the Russian Federation on Precious Metals and Gems v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 28, 1997No. C-96-2771-JLQPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Adjudication on the issue of judicial estoppel, heard on February 3, ,1997, in San Francisco, California. Mark E.. Beck and Joan M. Steinmann appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Jay R. Weill appeared on behalf of the Defendant. Having reviewed the record, heard from counsel, and being fully advised in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED for the following reasons.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND. This is one of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008