Legal Opinion · Dissent

G. C. Murphy Co. v. Reserve Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1980Published

1Dissent

Lupiano, J. (dissenting in part).

The facts are fairly stated in the opinion of the Presiding Justice. However, my view of the relevant statutory law and legal principles impels a different conclusion. The deposit of security envisioned by section 59-a of the Insurance Law is analogous for all practical purposes to a special deposit within the contemplation of the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (Insurance Law, §§ 517-524). *241This conclusion is buttressed by the policy considerations underlying section 59-a of the Insurance Law and by construing said statute in light of sections 519 (esp subds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. People v. . Granite State Provident Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Phillips v. PerueTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In re PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API