Thompson v. Williams

HUGHES, Justice.

This suit is upon a promissory note made by appellant, C. H. Thompson, and payable to appellee, Travis Williams.

Appellant admitted that the note was executed by him and is, according to its terms, due and payable.

Appellant complains, however, that the Court erred in sustaining appellee’s special exceptions to all defenses alleged in his answer and, appellant declining to amend, in rendering judgment for appellee upon the pleadings and appellant’s admissions, above stated.

The propriety of the Court’s action depends, of course, upon the validity of the defenses pleaded by…