Legal Opinion

O'CON v. Hightower

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1954No. 12682PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellant, O’Con, has appealed from a default judgment in favor of appellee, Hightower, which cancelled a promissory note given by Hightower to appellant in part consideration for a sale of the fixtures, equipment, merchandise, and place of business known as “O’Con’s Shamrock Ice Station Number Two.”

Hightower bought the place of business by paying $2,000 in cash and delivering her promissory note in the principal amount of $3,000, secured by a chattel mortgage on the fixtures, merchandise and equipment. Hightower asserted in her petition that the sale was induced by fraudulent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Milam v. Cooper Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Chambers v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shenandoah Associates v. J & K Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Minneapolis-Moline Company v. PurserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Costley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
  4. Anthony Pools v. Charles & David, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Laslie v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API