Legal Opinion

Faddis v. Woollomes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Allen District Gom't. Mary E. Faddis, a married woman, purchased directly from her husband, E. P. Faddis, a colt, and paid for said colt with money belonging to her in her own light. Afterward, her husband contracted a debt, was sued thereon, and upon a judgment rendered against him for said debt an execution was issued to Woollomes, as constable, and by the latter levied on tlje said colt. The plaintiff brought replevin.

Read the full summary

Error from Allen District Gom't. Mary E. Faddis, a married woman, purchased directly from her husband, E. P. Faddis, a colt, and paid for said colt with money belonging to her in her own light. Afterward, her husband contracted a debt, was sued thereon, and upon a judgment rendered against him for said debt an execution was issued to Woollomes, as constable, and by the latter levied on tlje said colt. The plaintiff brought replevin. The case was removed from a justice’s court to the district court, by appeal, and was tried at the January Term 1870. The district court held that “the contract…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

We do not think that it is necessary to consider the preliminary questions raised by the plaintiff in error, for a decision of the main question involved in the case will dispose of the whole case finally. The main questions involved are precisely the same as those decided in the case of Going v. Orns, 8 Kas., 85, to which we refer. (See also Monroe v. May, 9 Kas., 466; Deering v. Boyle, 8 Kas., 525, and Wicks v. Mitchell, 9 Kas., 80, as deciding kindred questions.) A married woman may purchase personal property,, *58with her own money, from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Going v. OrnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Deering v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Wicks v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manning v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Sproul v. Atchison National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Dickson v. RandalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Miner v. PearsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Horder v. HorderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API