Horder v. Horder
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Leavenworth District Court. At the September Term, 1878, of the district court, Geo. W. Horder and three others as plaintiffs had judgment against Lucy Horder and two others as defendants, who bring the case to this court. 'The nature of the action is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*392The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action substantially for partition of real estate, and the principal question involved, therein is, whether a certain deed of conveyance executed by James W. Horder in his lifetime to his wife, Lucy Horder,. without further consideration than love and affection, is valid or not, as against an heir of Horder after his death, which* heir was of full age at the time of the execution of the deed,, and was in no manner dependent upon Horder for subsistence or support.
We have never had occasion to pass upon just such a case-as this,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunt v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Ogden v. WaltersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Wells v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court · 1858
- Going v. OrnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clester v. ClesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Olson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. ColdwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Eberhart v. RathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913