Dickson v. Randal
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Nemaha District Court. TVo actions of replevin were brought against Dickson, a ’ constable—one by Anna Randal, and the other by M. B. Casey. Both cases were tried together, at the May Term 1876 of the district court. "Verdicts and judgments for plaintiffs, and Dickson brings the'cases here. The facts and proceedings are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*213The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
1. Appearance; jurisdiction. On January 18th 1876, Anna Eandal and B. M. Casey commenced their separate actions in replevin against Dickson, before a justice of the peace of Nemaha county, to obtain the possession of two calves, levied upon by Dickson, as constable, under an execution in his hands issued upon a judgment against J. H. Eandal in favor of Wolfley, Morris & Co. The calves were only worth $10 each. On the return-day of the two summonses the said Dickson appeared in each case before the justice and obtained an adjournment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Shoemaker, Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Haas v. LeesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Furrow v. ChapinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Going v. OrnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. B. Colt Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Skaer v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Eberhart v. RathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.