Legal Opinion

Perry v. United States Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 17, 2009No. Civil Action 09-638 (RMC)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Daniel M. Perry, proceeding pro se, sues his former employer, the United States Department of State, for disability discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. Mr. Perry argues that “in late 2005 and early 2006,” he was subjected to unlawful harassment because of his bipolar disorder and that this harassment “created a hostile and abusive work environment” and ultimately resulted in his “constructive termination in March 2006.” Am. Compl. [Dkt. # 9] ¶¶ 8, 27. The State Department moves to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Doak v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Uzlyan v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Fortune v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API