Legal Opinion

In Re Hansen Disciplinary Proceeding

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1978No. 15613PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

This proceeding reviews the findings and determination of the Utah State Bar that Phil L. Hansen has engaged in unprofessional conduct and its recommendation that he be disbarred for one year.

The alleged misconduct relates to his agreeing to represent Mrs. Kay Lou Behu-nin in a civil suit brought against her by Theodore H. Burr and during the pendency thereof undertaking to defend Mr. Burr in a criminal action brought against him; that he thus- had a conflict of interest in violation of Rule IV, Canon 5, Disciplinary Rule 5-105; and that for the service to Mrs. Behunin he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schwab v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Thatcher v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re BridwellUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re FullmerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Griva v. DavisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Anne P. Hendry v. Francis J. Pelland and Sadur, Pelland & Rubinstein, P.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. McCourt Co., Inc. v. FPC Properties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API