State v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on assault and larceny from the person. While these are lesser included offenses of the crime charged, we find no significant evidence to support an instruction thereon. Defendant would have the Court theorize that the assault on Rhinehart and the taking of his property may have been separate and unrelated crimes. Yet the only direct evidence presented at trial established that the victim was beaten and robbed by defendant and Taylor. Only evidence tending to show the absence of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. . SandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. RankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.