Legal Opinion
Plotkin v. Washington County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 26, 2000No. LUBA 98-133; CA A107171PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*248KISTLER, J.
Petitioners appealed to LUBA from a Washington County hearings officer’s preliminary approval of a 12-lot residential subdivision on a five-acre parcel. The parcel is located in an area that is designated “wildlife habitat” and that contains two wetland areas that have not been identified as resource lands in the county’s comprehensive plan documents. LUBA rejected petitioners’ contentions that the county’s decision was inconsistent with provisions of its Community Development Code (CDC) requiring preservation of fish and wildlife habitat areas and setting certain dimensional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Department of Transportation v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Wiard Memorial Park District v. Wiard Community Pool, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Johnson v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Ensley v. Strato-Lift, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2000
- Plotkin v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000