Legal Opinion

United States v. Vandegrift

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1913No. 1007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29613 (T. D. 32780).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The merchandise the subject of this appeal consists of certain wooden spools upon which as imported was wound artificial or imitation silk yarn. The ártificial or imitation silk was subjected to an ad valorem rate of duty under paragraph 405 of the tariff act of 1909. The spools upon which the artificial or imitation silk was wound were rated for duty by the collector as a manufacture of wood under the provisions of paragraph 215 of the said tariff act. Importers claim them dutiable as containers or holder or costs, charges, and expenses *356perforce of subsection 18 of section 28 of that act,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. RingkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Karthaus v. FrickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scaramelli & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Peacock Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API