Legal Opinion

Repko v. County of Georgetown

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 6, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2014-000156; No. 5374PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

In this negligence action, David M. Repko appeals the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict in favor of Georgetown County (the County). Repko argues the trial court erred in (1) construing Article V, Section 3-1 of the County Development Regulations (the Regulations) to preclude a “tort-like” duty when the plain language of that provision disclaims only a “financial-like” obligation1; (2) relying on the Regulations’ “sovereign immunity” provision when that provision is unenforceable because it is preempted by the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (TCA); (3) finding the Regulations did not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Edwards v. Lexington County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Repko v. Cnty. of GeorgetownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API