Repko v. County of Georgetown
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
In this negligence action, David M. Repko appeals the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict in favor of Georgetown County (the County). Repko argues the trial court erred in (1) construing Article V, Section 3-1 of the County Development Regulations (the Regulations) to preclude a “tort-like” duty when the plain language of that provision disclaims only a “financial-like” obligation1; (2) relying on the Regulations’ “sovereign immunity” provision when that provision is unenforceable because it is preempted by the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (TCA); (3) finding the Regulations did not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Edwards v. Lexington County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Repko v. Cnty. of GeorgetownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018